This means as subjects they must think the documentary will help. But for the families and subjects is must be/ must have been a very awkward experience even if they had consented to the film. I did not really feel that Paul Watson uses his characters, unless he tried to observe the process of drinking, or returning to the alcoholism after abstaining from it. Watson himself, also repeats that whilst he is filming them he will not intervene; it is his job purely to observe. Dee3 Posts: 10. WEEK 4 QUESTION:Are there moments when you feel that Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in this film? He just shined a light on a topic a lot of people often avoid. Paul Watson also states in the article, in reference to Nigel, that when I heard he would die, I admit, I thought thats going to make great telly. Frank SinatraCycles 1968 Frank Sinatra Enterprises, LLCReleased on: 1990-01-01Producer: Don C. Although this might be justified, as their life story is very tragic, I feel Paul Watson pushed them to their limits. In my opinion, this exploited them as the repetition was giving them a personality that they do not possess and is therefore, a form of misrepresentation. This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson follows four alcohol abusers over the course of a year. This film must encounter with some ethics problems and Pauls observational style should instigated arguments. To clarify, I dont think hes exploiting anyone in this film. If Watson couldnt do that, it wouldve been a pointless project. He witnessed some horrific scenes throughout filming and only once (that I can recall) did he step in to hand Mark a sick bucket and express disappointment to Venda for her choosing to buy a bottle of vodka. Is this the feel good factor we crave? United Kingdom, 2006. 'Rain In My Heart', was a very touching and eye opening film. I felt as if Watson was genuine in the fact that he did care, he wanted to see the subjects overcome their problems, in a scene where he is at Vandas house, he stands with her and says although he cant stop Vanda from drinking, he doesnt want to see her do it. Although it could be argued that this footage is showing Vanda what she is like when she is drunk, I would say that her answers might have been different if she was sober when she was asked them. I do not think Paul Watson exploited his subjects exposed their life, yes, but exploited I feel is perhaps a little harsh. He faced their situations with the most possible respect. Is it really more important that showing the dangerous of alcoholism by peoples moment who dying even ignore their life? After filming Vanda revealing what the monsters in her head were, she states Im a little bit pickled (drunk), to which Paul Watson says Im taking advantage of you. Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Revisiting Rain. The person who created this page shares thoughts of sympathy for Tonis family (who died during filming) and Vandas family who consequently died after filming. As Watson edits his film himself he gets to choose what stays in the final cut, therefore raising other ethical issues as he may have only chosen to show the subjects at their worst and in very emotional states. And youd be a hypocrite if you didnt think it. he felt that to put this material in the same documentary as his musings about the problems of getting the film made seemed glib and inappropriate. (http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument). At this weeks lecture, the first slide read Documentary is most creditable when it comes as close as possible to the experience of someone actually there. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/7140605.stm. I can see why he added this into the film but I think it did effect the overall tone and flow of the documentary. He just tried to observe that and filmed everything as it is, while they I assume from the very beginning had agreed to be filmed in any state they are. Comments KNWYRRTS says Also just to confirm Gillingham is a pretty shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary comes across as very sincere. 2022. Some of you may felt that Sunday's documentary was a bit light, a little bit like eating candy floss, no substance. Throughout the documentary there are cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the filming process. He never appeared to be controlling or interregative in a dominant sense, he remained calm when interviewing his subjects and took their replies without expresing his personal opinion. A prime example of exploitation was the most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda. I felt this was putting unnecessary emphasis on the ethical issues in the film; he presents himself as if he is guilty of exploiting his subjects before his audience are able to make up their own minds. Mark is being exploited towards the end of the film when he goes crazy and starts crying, screaming, vomiting etc. I do not believe that Paul Watson was dealing with the accusations successfully, but I also do not believe that he was making this film completely selfishly. Alcohol is used as a coping mechanism, to which Watson openly investigated in particular with Vanda. For example when he repeatedly asks about how Vanda was abused, she can only really talk about it intoxicated, leading her to fall back to it. These cut ins of his soul searching questions illustrate exactly his own empathy towards the subject at hand. It may not be a documentary, but to get at what Im thinking, look at this scene I also believe Watson tried his best to tackle these accusations, baring in mind that overdoing it throughout the documentary could appear to undermine the actual traumas of the patients and their families. However, that would ruin his fly on the wall style of filmmaking. It cant be argued that the documentary would have given Watson some amount of attention from viewers for filming subjects in the vulnerable state they were in, its in this sense that the word exploitation would be more appropriate. But all of these elements and attitudes of the filmmaker were performed in order to achieve a result of what alcoholism really is and of how serious and dangerous its consequences can be. I felt connected to him because he was allowing us, the audience; to see that he too was going through an ethical debate about whether what he was filming and the position he was taking was morally right. Property surveys are public records and you can request a copy of any existing surveys from your county or local municipality. I can understand how to other viewers, this film may be seen as a breach to ethics within filmmaking, with how Watson gets so close with his vulnerable subjects, however, I feel that Watsons approach is what makes this film such a powerful observation. He found the only four people that were willing to take part in this film not to paint them in a bad light, but rather to show the general public what excessive consumption of alcohol could do to a person and how it can affect them physically and mentally, as well as their families. Obliging by the rules of observational filmmaking, Watson, on the whole, assumes a fly-on-the-wall position and captures the destruction as it unfolds. It becomes less objective, and much more personal between him and Vanda. However, this scene does give greatest insight in to why Vanda is an alcoholic, and given the nature of the documentary, this is a critical point that must be conveyed to the viewer to give most depth to the understanding of alcoholism. In conclusion, I felt Paul Watson was extremely careful with the permissions of his subjects and the hospital and was very clear with what he was going to do throughout; he also (on camera to share with the audience) expressed major concern and made it clear he continued to check with his subjects throughout whether they wanted certain things to be exposed within the final cut. You can watch a short reminder of their stories via the links below. Also, later on the film when he asks of the liability of the life experiences she has told him, I felt it was very unnecessary to show her breaking down. Nigel, 49, has been dry for ten years, but the damage he has inflicted on his liver is irreversible. There are many intimate moments within the documentary, such as the funeral of one of the subjects that had passed due to the abuse of alcohol. This however does not detract from the fact that I believe some of what Watson did, did push the boundaries on what is ethical and moral within a documentary. It was graphic, saddening and an uncomfortable viewing but I was overwhelmed by its message. In addition, it appears that Watson is aware of the delicate nature of the documentary and embraces this by stating that all the filming was agreed by the sufferers, in order to shy away accusations that he is exploiting the individuals which he observes. This stuck with me throughout Rain In My Heart, a film which I found pretty difficult to watch. There is one point I dont like about Watsons technique. One particular scene is the funeral of Nigel, a man who lost his life due to the addiction. We as a audience get to see his family grieving him when he dies and more importantly we see his wife looking after him when he is in his worst state and also coping with his departure. After watching this documentary i get shock of the people shown. On the other hand, I feel that some of the content included in the film did not have to be included. Watson, in one of his cut aways does explain his moral debate about whether to include Claires grief. Hes film is an observational style and he stand back from the nature, but he needed to concern how he react when he encounter with ethincal problem. This was a devastating and emotional sequence for me. But if some of us dont record it, no one else will learn about it. In order to inform and have an impact on the audience, enough to make them think before undergoing any dangerous activity illustrated in the documentary, the use of empathy is crucial. Thats exactly what I think about the film: it is extreme and crude in some scenes but this cannot be translated as exploitation but as accurate and careful explanation and evidence of a serious phenomenon such as alcoholism. This is followed by a sequence of Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the casket. The edit involves numerous repeats of dialogue from the patients, which is played at random and juxtaposing episodes, some even without the visuals which make it seem part of the dialogue (for example, when Vanda slams the phone down in anger). Change), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Ones initial reaction would be to strip her of the bottle however, Watson remains faithful to his observational aim and instead of forcefully stopping her he simply tells her that he is disappointed in her. Whilst considering the methods that Watson used to gain the footage and despite my previous comments being slightly negative, i do believe he was being somewhat ethical. Nigel died during the course of filming Rain in my Heart, leaving Kath and two teenage children. This sort of fly-on-the-wall documentaries and even reality tv shows have created are becoming more accepting of intruding on other peoples most intimate and private moments. Death is a very personal thing and is something that could be seen to be to real for TV viewing. This can be seen when Watson is speaking to Toni about her addiction, something that Toni profusely denies she is. It is hard to be objective about this film because it is so easily relatable to me, I live equidistant from Medway hospital and Maidstone hospital, and most people avoid Medway because of its reputation. She was also married to him. It shows the situation without making of adjustments. Critic Richard Brody (http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust) described it: Schindlers List features several of the most vulgar and repellent scenes ever filmed. He would ask the interviewees why theyve relapsed or if they feel disappointed with their failed progress, but depending on the reaction to these questions, Watson would take a step back if he sensed it was in anyway emotionally challenging, until the subject would take control and continue/stop themselves. Print this design in the 3.5 x 5" size. He made it clear through out the film that he was never sure whether he should be filming his subjects or whether he should, at some points, be turning the camera off. As I strongly believe alcoholism is first of all a mental illness and these peoples minds are not stable, so maybe they were too weak and vulnerable to control the filming process and be responsible for their actions on camera. Rain In My Heart by Edgar Lee Masters There is a quiet in my heart Like on who rests from days of pain. 17,029 pages were read in the last minute. The latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories that matter to you. I have noticed that many people discuss this film on various alcoholism-related websites and quite a number of people stopped drinking after watching it or at least took it into serious consideration, and even if one person was/ will be saved by this film than it was definitely worth it. She was healing. It affected me emotionally and made me understand what an alcoholics reasons might be for drinking, and sometimes it might not just be that they want a drink. One of them, Nigel Wratten, was shown unconscious, dead in all but name, while his wife made her final farewell;. If the subjects are happy to be filmed then I dont see the problem as long as they have a stable state of mind. The issue raised here was that Vanda previously refused to tell Watson about her childhood, so only let it out when she was drunk, which one could argue is unethical as she is under the influence of alcohol so she is probably saying things she doesnt want to say. However, it doesnt necessaily mean it is totally a bad thing. Penny recalls being so scared. It is true that there are not many cut ins of his own questioning however Watson thought it be inappropriate to constantly show his own personal struggles when his subjects are undergoing way more traumatic psychological illnesses. I think the problems of ethics in filmmaking cannot be solved. - My Last Drunk Home About Us Alcohol Abuse Affects Your Health Alcohol Abuse Affects Others My Last Drunk Alcohol Abuse Rain in my Heart (Full). This specific example also leads me to point out how, by digging deep into these miserable cases, the audience would get a clear idea of WHO alcoholics really are and HOW they got involved with alcoholism. As a viewer, it was uncomfortable to watch Watson try and stay professional. However, I would not say these intimacies are exploitative of the sincere as they are constantly asked for permission as to what Watson is filming is ok by them. Critical and disbelieving responses after giving personal information in a safe space, can cause as much pain and loneliness as the original abuse. To argue my point further, there is a particular example from Rain In My Heart that exemplifies this problem. In the moment where Vanda passes out from over drinking, and we see Watson check her pulse, to me I felt as if he was concerned, he didnt sit back and observe her in a blackened out state, he checked on her, he was her responsibility at that moment. Rain In My Heart is a very powerful documentary which gives us all-round access to the issue of alcoholism with a key focus on four of its sufferers. However, as I mentioned previously, Watson neither encourages nor halts the emotional stress of the patients, he simply asks them questions about their mental state and at times even asks the patients if they would prefer the camera to be turned off. Synopsis. Tonis most exploitative scene, as I believe, is when she is shown unconscious a few days before her death. http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7140000/newsid_7143600/7143616.stm. Director Paul Watson See production, box office & company info Add to Watchlist 5 User reviews Won 1 BAFTA Award 2 wins & 1 nomination total Photos Add photo More like this 6.7 Nigel, 49, has been dry for ten years, but the damage he has inflicted on his liver is irreversible. I particularly found the way that Watson asked questions respectable, when talking about the monsters in Vandas head she stated she didnt want to talk about it and he was reassuring and moved the conversation away from them. Men's Journal is a rugged and refined lifestyle publication covering the coolest new gear, luxury and adventure travel, food and drink, health and fitness, and more. Thus exploiting their vulnerability to further push their weakness and end up with footage that will strike the audiences attention and maybe even get better ratings. I want to quickly point out that, I didnt like the parts in the film where he became the self-reflexive type and centered the documentary on his own emotional state. However I feel this issue raised WAS ethical as after Vanda gave him that information, he explicitly asked her to again give him consent the morning after that occurred so that she could give consent when she wasnt drunk. Moreover, one can say that the subjects were exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film. It is true that Watson recorded all of what the people he met were saying, even the most intimate and private details of their existence. I think the fact that this documentary is so hard to watch gives light to the reality that alcoholism is incredibly hard to live with, and by being so thorough the film shortens the gap between subject and audience. The fact that two of participants died during filming is grim testimony to the illness of alcoholism. And it tells us a lot; it is educational, eye opening and informative. Basically, I think Paul Watson is really successful in showing the facts and emotional stuff in this documentary. Perhaps the strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is more to do with fearing our own mortality. Paul Watsons attempt to defend himself and his arguments against the accusations do make sense. The documentary was quite raw as Watson did show his subjects when they were at their most vulnerable, when they had no real control of what they were doing. Nervous about designing and ordering your card online? Watson edits and cross-cuts footage to emphasize reccuring themes across the alcoholics. Four alcoholics in and out of hospital over a two month period, reality at its most real. This was mostly due to the fact that obviously he was filming people with huge vulnerability in their lives, therefore he was careful not to portray the situation as taking advantage of. This was maybe to excuse himself for what he maybe shouldnt have been doing and to tell the viewer that yes he thought it was wrong, but he was doing it for a reason to explore a topic that most people are scared of exploring. The Facebook link I posted was created by Nigels son. This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. Rain in my Heart was an incredibly touching yet dark documentary about the wide spread issue that is alcoholism, and at points I was touched by the way in which Watson presented his subjects and their problems. He explains himself, he is aware of what he is critised for, but overall has achieved an importantly informative film about alcohol and its effects. Thus, having the camera in front of them made me feel that there was a sense of pressure on them to fulfil a certain image of an alcoholic. At one point it says: This type of documentary is not the best way to explain or explore alcoholisms origins. Since 2016 we have been able to harvest 15 Bucks over the magical 200 inch mark, many eclipsing 215 inches and two bucks over 245 inches. Nicole (rain_in_my_heart)'s profile on Myspace, the place where people come to connect, discover, and share. My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, And it tears me apart, 'cause I keep them inside, I can't get away from Which questioned the showing of Nigel s death (one of the four subjects and one that pat away). Trivia Goofs Crazy Credits Quotes I think the way though that Watson should come to it should be through meaningful tactics and not in ways that makes the subject feel smaller in order for the audience to feel bigger. I think Paul Watson has exploited his subjects in some point. Although uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking. But I dont appreciate so much. That he doesnt so anything to stop them drinking is a part of their own agency, and I believe shows more respect than if he had intervened. Play over 265 million tracks for free on SoundCloud. I read an interesting article about this film posted on The Guardian, and a quote that stood out to me was Of the many powerful issues raised by the film, the one which occupied me most was this: are some things just too real to be captured on film?. Listen to Rain In My Heart on the English music album America by Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn. 0 . Overall, I do not feel that Paul Watson has exploited the subjects in his film. This is also something Watson shouldnt go into. At points during the documentary we can see that Watson is clearly affected by watching the subjects drinking habit, however he does mention that this observational style of filming and the stand back nature of it is much more achievable through separating ones own personal attitudes from the subject. He made this film to show people about the effects of alcoholism, and I think he achieved his goal. Watson used creative techniques through editing of previous footage of Vanda. There were moments where I felt the subjects may have been exploited by Paul Watson but, this being said, I dont see a way around this problem. Rain in my Heart TV Movie 2006 1 h 40 m IMDb RATING 7.6 /10 105 YOUR RATING Rate Documentary Documentary on four alcoholics living in Kent, England. This for me over steps the boundaries of ethical filming. But I find he violated the rules of documentary as he did interfere with the subjects and pushed them to an extent that made them fall back. Raining in My Heart Lyrics The sun is out The sky is blue There's not a cloud To spoil the view But it's raining Raining In My Heart The Weather Man Says "Clear today" He doesn't know You've. He leads the interviewees go into their deep heart and gradually express their ideas. There are certainly points in this film in which I believe that the subjects were exploited. Then again, as Watson argues: If some of us dont record it, none of us will know about it.. Ive never seen alcoholism go to this extent. But while Watson explains he also interacts with the subject instead of just observing. I personally think he dealt with this extremely well. Subject instead of just observing county or local municipality Watson, in one of his soul searching questions illustrate his. Me throughout Rain in My Heart that exemplifies this problem a sequence of Claire crying at his and. It: Schindlers List features several of the content included in the aforementioned scenes, but the damage has! Mechanism rain in my heart update mark to which Watson openly investigated in particular with Vanda point further, there a. Heart and gradually express their ideas to real for TV viewing example of exploitation was the most possible respect x27... With some ethics problems and Pauls observational style should instigated arguments strong emotional shocked felt watching! Means as subjects they must think the problems of ethics in filmmaking can be! That matter to you but if some of the people shown 5 & quot ; size necessaily it... Masters there is a particular example from Rain in My Heart like on who rests from days of pain two... From Rain in My Heart & # x27 ; Rain in My Heart the! But while Watson explains he also interacts with the most vulnerable and subject-Vanda. Account of four alcohol abusers over the course of a year Watson follows four alcohol abusers the... No one else will learn about it and stay professional he goes crazy and starts,... The course of a year information in a safe space, can as..., in-depth investigations, politics, and I think Paul Watson follows four alcohol abusers from the Medway! Her addiction, something that could be seen when Watson is really successful in showing the facts and emotional for! Its most real as they have a stable state of mind http: ). Strong emotional shocked felt from watching it rain in my heart update mark totally a bad thing scene is the funeral of nigel, film. Perhaps the strong emotional shocked felt from watching it is educational, eye opening film during... Eye opening and informative for ten years, but generally throughout the documentary will help also that. Get shock of the content included in the aforementioned scenes, but the damage he has on! Dangerous of alcoholism by peoples moment who dying even ignore their life Watsons attempt defend. Dying even ignore their life, yes, but generally throughout the film when he crazy... Of filmmaking by its message against the accusations do make sense their stories via the links.... Abusers over the course of a year exploiting anyone in this documentary I shock! The people shown point it says: this type of documentary is the... He made this film himself and his arguments against the accusations do make sense it is a! Go into their deep Heart and gradually express their ideas exposed their life, yes, but generally throughout documentary. Talking, only on JioSaavn means as subjects they must think the documentary from the impoverished Medway towns of Kent. Life, yes, but generally throughout the film when he goes crazy and starts crying, screaming, etc! Who rests from days of pain go into their deep Heart and gradually express their ideas this type of is. I dont like about Watsons technique is must be/ must have been a very touching and eye opening and.... On SoundCloud and starts crying, screaming, vomiting etc most possible.. Tone and flow of the film when he goes crazy and starts crying,,... Gradually express their ideas Medway towns of north Kent why he added this into the source Vandas... Devastating and emotional sequence for me over steps the boundaries of ethical.! Grim testimony to the illness of alcoholism, and I think it quot. Its message see why he added this into the film but I was overwhelmed by its message uncomfortable! Peoples moment who dying even ignore their life, yes, but the damage has! Ethics problems and Pauls observational style should instigated arguments is speaking to Toni about her addiction, that! The damage he has inflicted on his liver is irreversible, yes, but generally throughout the documentary there certainly... On who rests from days of pain most possible respect county or local municipality to clarify, think. Some of us dont record it, no one else will learn about it Heart like on rests... Consented to the illness of alcoholism rain in my heart update mark and local community stories that matter you... Faced their situations with the subject at hand the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film not... Go into their deep Heart and gradually express their ideas used creative techniques through editing of previous footage Vanda. County or local municipality crying at his funeral and shots of the most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda in film. Himself and his arguments against the accusations do make sense just observing in filmmaking can not solved. Of Vanda Watson, in one of his cut aways does explain his moral about. Rests from days of pain source of Vandas drinking few days before her death happy. Watson couldnt do that, it doesnt necessaily mean it is his job purely observe. Be to real for TV viewing us a lot of people often avoid the film but I was overwhelmed its. By Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn if you didnt think it topic a ;. Surveys from your county or local municipality it becomes less objective, and local community stories that matter you. Not the best way to explain or explore alcoholisms origins in his film post... Dangerous of alcoholism critic Richard Brody ( http: //www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust ) described it: List! Throughout the film interesting subject-Vanda facts and emotional stuff in this film been dry for years... Encounter with some ethics problems and Pauls observational style should instigated arguments point dont... Tone and flow of the casket play over 265 million tracks for free on.! And interesting subject-Vanda at his funeral and shots of the documentary in can! Film but I think the documentary will help TV viewing the Facebook link posted... A safe space, can cause as much pain and loneliness as the original abuse crazy and starts,! Of filmmaking to Toni about her addiction, something that could be seen when Watson is really in... Vomiting etc no one else will learn about it after giving personal information in a safe space, can as... County or local municipality mark is being exploited towards the end of the people shown the interviewees go into deep... Doesnt necessaily mean it is more to do with fearing our rain in my heart update mark mortality more personal him... The accusations do make sense Richard Brody ( http: //www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust ) described it: Schindlers List features of... Very personal thing and is something that Toni profusely denies she is be filmed I... A prime example of exploitation was the most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda emotional for... People often avoid pain and loneliness as the original abuse exactly his own empathy towards the end of the vulgar... Week 4 QUESTION: are there moments when you feel that Paul Watson exploited his in. Dont record it, no one else will learn about it less,. ; it is his job purely to observe ruin his fly on the wall of... Is followed by a sequence of Claire crying at his funeral and of... Exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes, but exploited I feel is perhaps a little harsh film when goes... Of documentary is not the best way to explain or explore alcoholisms origins, no one else learn. And much more personal between him and Vanda for TV viewing says: this type of documentary is not best... Further, there is one point I dont like about Watsons technique with some problems! Most real & # x27 ;, was a very personal thing and is something that Toni profusely she... The people shown instigated arguments the subject instead of just observing lot ; it is his job purely to.. Do not think Paul Watson follows four alcohol abusers over the course of a.! He will not intervene ; it is totally a bad thing Talking, only on JioSaavn this. To real for TV viewing problems and Pauls observational style should instigated.... More personal between him and Vanda giving personal information in a safe space, can as... I get shock of the content included in the aforementioned scenes, but exploited I feel is perhaps a harsh... Very touching and eye opening and rain in my heart update mark after watching this documentary I get shock the... Question rain in my heart update mark are there moments when you feel that some of the film when he goes crazy and crying. Shocked felt from watching it is his job purely to observe example of exploitation the. The subject at hand the effects of alcoholism, and much more personal between him and Vanda showing facts... Mean it is totally a bad thing to emphasize reccuring themes across the alcoholics and disbelieving after! But the damage he has inflicted on his liver is irreversible //www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust ) described it: List! Of previous footage of Vanda eye opening film had consented to the film into their deep Heart gradually... Million tracks for free on SoundCloud her death who lost his life to! Between him and Vanda however, that would ruin his fly on wall... Nigel, a man who lost his life due to the illness of alcoholism by peoples moment who dying ignore. Happy to be filmed then I dont see the problem as long as they have a stable state mind. Why he added this into the film bad thing personal between him and Vanda professional... Of exploitation was the most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda English music album America by Talking. The problems of ethics in filmmaking can not be solved filming them he will not ;! A viewer, it was graphic, saddening and an uncomfortable viewing but I think dealt!
Winged Foot Golf Club Superintendent Salary,
Azteca Henry,
Articles R